Most "don't know why" ones are probably stuff from the update to the submission system that accidentally flagged stuff; I expect it'll get corrected later today.
IMO, pretty much all today's new toon releases should have ELs - but don't - since Daz is once more boldly going into selling Star Trek models. It all has the look of the 1970s cartoon. The ship and its interiors even have "TOS" in their names - which is now used, even by the IP owner, for the first live action TV series.
Didn't Daz offer Trek add-ons for spaceships and SF clothing last year? That disappeared very quickly? I'm as big a Star Trek fan as I am Star Wars & I am staying well away from these.
IMO, pretty much all today's new toon releases should have ELs - but don't - since Daz is once more boldly going into selling Star Trek models. It all has the look of the 1970s cartoon. The ship and its interiors even have "TOS" in their names - which is now used, even by the IP owner, for the first live action TV series.
Didn't Daz offer Trek add-ons for spaceships and SF clothing last year? That disappeared very quickly? I'm as big a Star Trek fan as I am Star Wars & I am staying well away from these.
Technically "TOS" in this case stands for "Toon Outer Space". Technically.
IMO, pretty much all today's new toon releases should have ELs - but don't - since Daz is once more boldly going into selling Star Trek models. It all has the look of the 1970s cartoon. The ship and its interiors even have "TOS" in their names - which is now used, even by the IP owner, for the first live action TV series.
Didn't Daz offer Trek add-ons for spaceships and SF clothing last year? That disappeared very quickly? I'm as big a Star Trek fan as I am Star Wars & I am staying well away from these.
Technically "TOS" in this case stands for "Toon Outer Space". Technically.
LOL Winking & nodding right along with everyone else.
Just saying that Paramount can be more obsessive about Trek than Disney is about their IPs. Around the turn of the century, the ST fan clubs had to rebrand as generic SF clubs. Fortunately, that only lasted a few years.
Well, I grabbed the toon TOS ship-interiors stuff,and the iRay add-ons, using my 8 tokins.... partly because I didn't want it to disappear out from under me like that TNG-inspired pack did. But also because I've been doing Trek TOS stuff occasionally. And also because one or more of my RP sonas came from a space-adventure univserse that borrowed designs from various space-opera shows. ("Hey, we can BUILD that!" And promptly did.)
IMO, pretty much all today's new toon releases should have ELs - but don't
It has been semi-officially stated that Editorial Licences will not be used again going forwards (although it is marginally possible they may be used for specifically licenced products).
I don't think Daz want to roll it back on anything that already had one, but they did cause various nuisances that seem to have been deemed not worth it in the long run.
I've seen vendors say that submissions are no longer being accepted for ELs, and the last product to have an EL was October. Since then, the moderators have basically said that everything that's been reported as initially having had one was a mistake in the product submission system.
It's not a hard announcement, but it's reasonably reputable sources. So unless we actually start to see new EL products again, it's probably not out of place for a specific product to not have one, even if you'd've expected it to have one this time last year.
Comments
https://www.daz3d.com/m10-m36-wolverine-td
Another one that I don't get the need for EL. It's an obsolete military vehicle last produced in 1943 81 years ago
https://www.daz3d.com/jessica-for-genesis-9
Why?
I don't recognize her from anything or as anybody
Jennifer Garner, maybe?
Don't know face looks to narrow and long for her
The promos suggest it's supposed to be (Elektra) but it's a near, not a lookalike, for me.
https://www.daz3d.com/sexy-skinz--woodland-warrior-for-genesis-9?trk_msg=U8D3JS57JKTKNEMU00PAVEFIB4&trk_contact=M7Q9EGE424DGD10TKCKABC2JR8&trk_sid=EMB17JL6O5K12SP9I591NDTC6S&trk_link=80IP4FGMUMQKBEDGPI6QN1BGV4&utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Sexy+Skinz+-+Woodland+Warrior+for+Genesis+9+
Why?
maybe an error as Martin Frost's atmospheres product also EL
see you didn't get an answer but just looked and it's normal now
https://www.daz3d.com/blanche-hd-for-genesis-9
No idea why.
Most "don't know why" ones are probably stuff from the update to the submission system that accidentally flagged stuff; I expect it'll get corrected later today.
Not sure if this one has been discussed, it's in my wishlist and I would like to buy it on sale, but not if it should have an editorial license.
https://www.daz3d.com/se-futuristic-hall
As pointed out in another thread it is basically a copy of the original Paul Rudolph Burroughs Wellcome building interior, which was demolished in January 2021.
So has Daz looked into this one already and said ok? Or are they unaware of it? I would really like to know before I buy it and use it.
IMO, pretty much all today's new toon releases should have ELs - but don't - since Daz is once more boldly going into selling Star Trek models. It all has the look of the 1970s cartoon. The ship and its interiors even have "TOS" in their names - which is now used, even by the IP owner, for the first live action TV series.
Didn't Daz offer Trek add-ons for spaceships and SF clothing last year? That disappeared very quickly? I'm as big a Star Trek fan as I am Star Wars & I am staying well away from these.
Technically "TOS" in this case stands for "Toon Outer Space". Technically.
LOL Winking & nodding right along with everyone else.
Just saying that Paramount can be more obsessive about Trek than Disney is about their IPs. Around the turn of the century, the ST fan clubs had to rebrand as generic SF clubs. Fortunately, that only lasted a few years.
Well, I grabbed the toon TOS ship-interiors stuff,and the iRay add-ons, using my 8 tokins.... partly because I didn't want it to disappear out from under me like that TNG-inspired pack did. But also because I've been doing Trek TOS stuff occasionally. And also because one or more of my RP sonas came from a space-adventure univserse that borrowed designs from various space-opera shows. ("Hey, we can BUILD that!" And promptly did.)
It has been semi-officially stated that Editorial Licences will not be used again going forwards (although it is marginally possible they may be used for specifically licenced products).
I don't think Daz want to roll it back on anything that already had one, but they did cause various nuisances that seem to have been deemed not worth it in the long run.
Wow! Yeah, I also always thought the EL idea was asking for trouble. Glad they seem to have abandoned the approach.
Interesting. I hadn't heard that.
Me neither. So I guess it's back to the old "use your own judgement & at your own risk."
I've seen vendors say that submissions are no longer being accepted for ELs, and the last product to have an EL was October. Since then, the moderators have basically said that everything that's been reported as initially having had one was a mistake in the product submission system.
It's not a hard announcement, but it's reasonably reputable sources. So unless we actually start to see new EL products again, it's probably not out of place for a specific product to not have one, even if you'd've expected it to have one this time last year.